Am 29.09.22 um 08:19 schrieb Alessio Cecchi via mailop:
I think it is not a correct behavior, if you can identify a message as unwanted
why do you have to send it anyway?
Often such identification isn't 100% certain (in fact, no spam/ham distinction
can ever be 100% correct).
Of course, if the message originated from a Microsoft customer it might be more reasonable to return it to the sender
with an indication of what was considered questionable, but even the decision whether a message was created by the
customer may be difficult in cases of mail forwarding etc.
Offloading the decision to the recipient at least ensures that no valid e-mail is ever prevented from reaching them,
which is a (questionable IMO) legal requirement in the EU.
I'd rather prefer if they rejected identified spam instead of delivering it, but then I also want world peace. And a
pony. With my luck, I'll get none of these.
Cheers,
Hans-Martin
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
