Honestly, if you asked me, I think it’s probably stupid. I remember getting a 22 dollar bill from Dr. Love Joy down in Key West, and I’m sure he can probably register with the FEC without any issues. This is probably going to be a great Last Week Tonight with John Oliver episode at the end of things. IMHO, I really don’t want to destroy my reputation by hosting crap because I followed the rules and let someone with a FEC approval to literally send a bunch of spam on my ip addresses. I have literally dealt with this before, but they had received a DDOS attack greater than the spam problem before we asked them politely to change providers.
Sincerely, Eric Tykwinski TrueNet, Inc. P: 610-429-8300 > On Jul 14, 2022, at 6:42 PM, Brandon Long via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 10:28 AM Andrew C Aitchison via mailop > <mailop@mailop.org <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>> wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Jul 2022, Anne Mitchell via mailop wrote: > >> On Jul 9, 2022, at 8:15 PM, Brett Schenker via mailop <mailop@mailop.org > >> <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>> wrote: > >> > >> Just put it all in quarantine. It only requires reporting on how much is > >> going to spam. Reporting 0 would technically be correct since quarantine > >> is different. > > > > Or a 'Political' tab, just like the 'Promotions' tab. > > Wouldn't that be labelling, which would mean they need explict > permission before enabling it for each user ? > > The labeling she mentioned is from a proposed law, not one that has passed. > It is interesting that the proposed law uses the term labeling and not spam > label or spam folder... it also talks about "primary inbox"... > > Brandon > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
