On Tue, 2021-12-28 at 12:19 -0600, Richard W via mailop wrote: > Those that advocate IP addresses are PII still drive around with a > license plate on their car. That's even more PII out in the open as > that is a static IP.
Those that advocate what is PII and what is not are diverting from what should be the real focus of attention: it is not whether the data can be used to identify me or not, it is by whom it can be used and for what purpose. On Tue, 2021-12-28 at 10:36 -0800, Jay Hennigan via mailop wrote: > Don't forget that politicians conveniently exempted themselves from > TCPA and anti-spam laws. And those loopholes should be closed at the next possible opportunity with every possible (non-violent) means, including voting those politicians out at the next possible opportunity. > How about content providers selling lists of which households watch > which adult PPV channels? Subject them to a non-consensual taste of their own medicine. And I do not mean to make them watch. Make them do. S1E1 Black Mirror style. On Wed, 2021-12-29 at 10:35 +1000, Noel Butler via mailop wrote: > As to the anti privacy brigade, suck it up, we are network operators, > if we want to know who they are, we can And you should. The purpose of ensuring network integrity/security is a legitimate limitation on my property/privacy right. No right is absolute, and there are worse limitations on property than this. Try talk zoning laws with your local municipality. The day you will have a say over who can use the data you generate and for what purpose, on the same level and with the same legal protection as do Hollywood or Netflix, my work as privacy advocate will be done. -- Yuval Levy, JD, MBA, CFA Ontario-licensed lawyer _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
