Hi Rob, I'm biased as part of the Exim development team.
Exim - is actively maintained - has a huge user base - provides more flexibility than other MTA I'm aware of (but, this is *my* PoV) > That mean Exim is the only real choice? It was a good laughing from this > recent mailop post about Exim vulnerability and I see Exim gets regular > vulnerabilities. > https://www.mail-archive.com/mailop@mailop.org/msg12993.html > > But it look like Exim have infinite customization possibility which should > help me. I guessing that one must accept more vulnerabilities for having > more power flexibility that Exim gives. A huge number of major companies and individual users run Exim systems faced to the internet. Apart from the known and publicly communicated vulnerabilities we do not know of any security issues in the wild. (I'm not talking about issues introduced by unfortunate configuration - the flexible configuration gives you the power to kill yourself. But even here we're working (recently we introduced the concept of "tainted" data)). You're invited to use Exim. And you are introduced to contribute. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
