Hi Florian, I represent a platform that sends mail on behalf of our customers but we maintain a separate 5321.From that points back to us. We dual-sign messages using the client domain and our own domain, but these do not align. We rely on DKIM alignment to pass a DMARC test.
Example: 5321.MailFrom: {encoded local part}@ourcompany.com 5322.FromHeader: r...@customer.com DKIM 1: customer.com DKIM 2: ourcompany.com I can provide real-world samples off-list, but the gist I'm getting from all this is that since I don't have SPF alignment, these messages will get rejected? Regards, Dave On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 3:39 PM Florian.Kunkel--- via mailop < mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > Hi Luke, *! > > / > Has anyone gotten a firm answer on these scenarios yet? > 5321.from: mailto:boun...@srv12.example.com > 5322.from: mailto:cont...@example.com > The vast majority of our customers will have a subdomain on the 5321 from > that isn't present on the 5322 from. I'd like to know if this is a problem. > \ > > you are asking for non strict alignment? ... yes that should be ok, as > long it's a subdomain to your domain (and not to a public suffix). > at least I'm not jet aware of an abusive scenario so far. > > > / > I'd also like to hear confirmation that messages with 2 DKIM signatures > will still "pass" if one matches the 5322 and one doesn't. > \ > > we'll love if one signature matches both from; 5321 AND 5322. > additional valid signatures welcome, ideally matching the sending > infrastructure. > > hth > > Florian > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop >
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop