On 01/03/2021 18.41, John Levine wrote:
> In article <8a937890-bfd7-8ee9-3818-063c12d68...@iki.fi> you write:
>>      } until match IP address connecting us or error count exceeded
>>
>> which means the error count very easily gets exceeded if your
>> email server uses IPv6 and few (or none) of the other host names in
>> the SPF record have such addresses.
> 
> That would be a fairly broken implementation.  RFC 7208 sec 4.3. says
> 
>   If the <domain> is malformed (e.g., label longer than 63 characters, 
>   zero-length label not at the end, etc.) or is not a multi-label 
>   domain name, or if the DNS lookup returns "Name Error" (RCODE 3,
>   also known as "NXDOMAIN" [RFC2308]), check_host() immediately
>   returns the result "none".  DNS RCODEs are defined in [RFC1035]. ...
> 
> If a name has an A record but no AAAA record, an AAAA lookup returns
> success with no records, often called NOERROR.  If your DNS library
> is returning NXDOMAIN in that situation, you need to find a better 
> library ASAP.

Unfortunately, RFC 7208 section 4.6.4 DNS Lookup limits also states:

   As described at the end of Section 11.1, there may be cases where it
   is useful to limit the number of "terms" for which DNS queries return
   either a positive answer (RCODE 0) with an answer count of 0, or a
   "Name Error" (RCODE 3) answer.  These are sometimes collectively
   referred to as "void lookups".  SPF implementations SHOULD limit
   "void lookups" to two.  An implementation MAY choose to make such a
   limit configurable.  In this case, a default of two is RECOMMENDED.

I read this as meaning most implementations will let you only have
two NOERRORs, and then it's game over. As I said, I doubt SPF was
intended to cause this side effect.

-- 
   /* * * Otto J. Makela <o...@iki.fi> * * * * * * * * * */
  /* Phone: +358 40 765 5772, ICBM: N 60 10' E 24 55' */
 /* Mail: Mechelininkatu 26 B 27,  FI-00100 Helsinki */
/* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * */
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to