Am 22.12.20 um 02:56 schrieb Eric Tykwinski via mailop: > Seriously, this is probably political… Not saying I agree, but unless it’s > spam, i.e. unwanted by your recipients, > then you just have a bunch of wack jobs as clients and keep it at that.
As John has stated in his original mail, it was spam. I think in most cases the subjectively-undesirable-but-not-illegal-and-not-unsolicited communication is a strawman argument. In my experience, subjectively-undesirable-but-not-illegal content such as anti-vaxxing misinformation, fake dating invitations, dubious investment opportunities are most often sent using spam mechanisms to people who did not subscribe to that stuff. We're not talking about social media communities sharing their favorite conspiracy theories, we're talking about Spam, Spam, Spam, lovely Spam delivered into people's inboxes. It would be really helpful to stop discussing content issues in the context of spam. As a religious person, I would be just as upset about religious spam as about any other. As a political person, I'd be upset about political spam, even if I share the views expressed by it. _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
