In article <81acc49e-3f6c-0905-a952-f4786841a...@pscs.co.uk> you write:
>There's also the opposite anti-spam trick that I've heard of:
>
>have two MX records. The higher priority MX just doesn't exist and the 
>real mail server is the lower priority one. Badly written spam software 
>will try the higher one and when that doesn't respond, it'll give up. 
>Well written mail senders try the higher one, then use the lower one 
>when the higher one doesn't respond.

I tried that for a while. I found that some senders took quite a while
to give up on the nolist host and go to the backup so it caused
noticable mail delays.

_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to