On 4 Aug 2020, at 04:29, John Levine via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > > In article <28453035-f078-4311-8472-1aa190c45...@isipp.com > <mailto:28453035-f078-4311-8472-1aa190c45...@isipp.com>> you write: >> >> >> From the judgement: >> >> "he plaintiff has shown that it has complied with the Hague Convention and >> personally served a representative authorized to accept service >> of process in London." > > The Spamhaus Project has not been located in the UK for a long time. > Whoever the process server handed his paperwork to, it wasn't > Spamhaus. > > Ever since the E360 fiasco Spamhaus hasn't responded to US suits. They > have no assets in the US, and while responding to tell the US court > that it doesn't have jurisdiction is possible, it's expensive and not > very productive. > > They really do have their office in Andorra and could be served or > sued there, but I doubt the kinds of organizations that are likely to > sue them would make much headway in Andorran courts. > > It is my impression that for this particular suit, Spamhaus wasn't > even aware of it until someone noticed a press release.
What John said. Regards, Steve Linford Chief Executive The Spamhaus Project https://www.spamhaus.org
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
