I'm pretty sure "spammers lie" holds up in court. :P On Mon, Aug 3, 2020, 5:59 PM Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop < mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> > > >> From the judgement: > >> "The plaintiff has shown that it has complied with the Hague Convention > and personally served a representative authorized to accept service of > process in London." > > > > Rule #1 of spam: Spammers lie. > > Absolutely. > > However, a court isn't going to take a party's word that they served > someone, you are required to file a proof of service, which is served by > someone *other* than the party (a process server). Parties to a lawsuit > are not allowed to serve process on the other party, for that very reason. > > Anne > > -- > Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law > Dean of Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School > CEO, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification > Advisor, Governor's Innovation Response Team Task Force > Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law) > Legislative Consultant, GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant > Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange > Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop > Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS) > Location: Boulder, Colorado > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop >
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
