In article <3e229a32-88db-4fdb-b67a-c68d0b65e...@gmail.com> you write:
>SPF.  Insofar as I reject at the “front door” (SMTP connection) if SPF fails 
>(example is a domain using
>“-all”).  I would imagine this is pretty vanilla so far compared to other 
>folks.

To be blunt, it is among hobby mail servers. It isn't among people who
actually want to provide mail service.

For most of us, the only time we take "-all" seriously is if it's the
only thing in the SPF record, to state that a domain sends no mail at
all.  Other than that, treat it the same as ~all or ?all because as
you have found a lot of people publish -all because it's "more secure"
but have no clue what they're doing.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to