On 15.10.19 10:44, Paul Smith via mailop wrote: > Ditto. Yesterday, I got 400 emails. About 200 were spam that was > filtered, about 15 were spam that wasn't filtered, the rest I wanted at > one level or another. No way do I want 200 spam messages shoved into my > Inbox.
So instead of rejecting these 200 mails directly and inform the sender that you didn't see them, you rather go through a list (doesn't matter if it's folder content or an email with details) daily and check them? And possibly miss an important one? And provide resources for them to be handled on your site? If you reject them, it's the sending MTAs problem (which might be abused and the postmaster learns about it this way). Even false positives would be handled by the sender who can either contact you in a different way or fix the reason for the false positive and resend the mail? Or you can just whitelist them if you are sure they are not bad guys? Here I thought, us IT guys are lazy and love to have someone else do the work? Why don't you in this case? ;-) Regards, Thomas Walter -- Thomas Walter Datenverarbeitungszentrale FH Münster - University of Applied Sciences - Corrensstr. 25, Raum B 112 48149 Münster Tel: +49 251 83 64 908 Fax: +49 251 83 64 910 www.fh-muenster.de/dvz/ _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
