On Mon 07/Oct/2019 23:38:23 +0200 Brandon Long via mailop wrote: > Also, it's hard to optimize for the servers that send us one message a day.
If it sends a message a day, it cannot be spam (by the B in UBE). > I've argued before that we should have better handling for the smallest > servers (whitelist the first 5 messages/day for low volume IPs, for > example), Yes, please :-) There don't seem to be big advantages for Google in killing small servers. It might more convenient to support them, for the sake of the mail ecosystem. > but the total volume compared to the effort against the major spam > campaigns, it's hard to get that high enough on the priority list. We did > make some changes for that for smtp time blocking, but it doesn't move any > of our numbers because the number of messages affected is tiny... and when > you're talking about IPv6, even small numbers like that can result in large > enough holes for spam campaigns. IPv4 allows to store a single DB record per IP address, even on a PC disk. And then, blocks like OVH's, formally assigned to different hosts, are not uniformly available to the same 0wner. Best Ale -- _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
