In article <20190428183815.ga30...@cmadams.net>, Chris Adams via mailop <c...@cmadams.net> wrote: >Once upon a time, Grant Taylor via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> said: >> On 4/28/19 11:35 AM, John Levine via mailop wrote: >> >Oversigning those headers is silly. >> >> Oversigning may be /silly/. But it's still the sending site's choice. > >So should mailing lists reject such messages? If they're going to add >headers and the signing effectively says "don't", why should the list >accept the message?
Keep in mind that the silly Exim DKIM signature has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with the Gmail rejections. Those are solely a problem of mailop's mail not meeting Google's public requirements, and it's a problem that only the people who run mailop and its DNS can fix. In any event, a list could remove old DKIM signatures if they don't validate any more. That wouldn't be very hard, the list does what it does to the message, then reruns the DKIM checks and throws away the DKIM headers that fail. But I would be surprised if that made any difference to where the mail ended up. _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
