On 2018-04-11 at 14:41 -0700, Carl Byington wrote: > So we could (do what they want) interpret mx:mail.example.com as if it > were a:mail.example.com
FWIW, both RFC 4408 from 2006 and RFC 7208 from 2014 explicitly "MUST NOT" this behavior. Section 5.4 in each. > What does your code do when it sees mx:mail.example.com, where there is > no mx record, but there is an a record? Exim uses libspf2 and does whatever libspf2 does. Actually looking in libspf2's codebase, it looks like it complies with the RFCs here. -Phil, Exim hat probably on _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
