Hey Bill, Thank you for your answer, yes, that's what I though also.
2018-03-19 5:18 GMT+01:00 Bill Cole <mailop-20160...@billmail.scconsult.com> : > On 18 Mar 2018, at 13:41, Bressier Simon wrote: > > Hey folks, >> >> Do you actually cares about ATPS & ADSP on your side ? >> > > No one ever has, as far as I can tell. > > I can only see that >> there's few mails on my inbox having a ATPS verification, mostly on some >> ML. >> >> I think these 2 RFC are going to be deprecated, even if only experimental >> for years, I've never seen a real adoption of these 2 propositions >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6541.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5617.txt >> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-adsp-rfc5617- > to-historic/history/ > > I suppose DMARC is now replacing completely those, but wondering if any >> major ISP/ESP has already implemented it ? >> > > The justification for rendering ADSP "historic" included an assertion of > harm from misapplication. I know that the Oracle messaging server supported > checking ADSP because Apple's MobileMe/iCloud service added > Authentication-results headers with dkim-adsp tokens for about 2 years. > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop >
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
