On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Mark Foster <blak...@blakjak.net> wrote:
> I'm not sure what you're reporting here. Is it supposed to work? > > I found no reference to it on any official Google support websites when I > searched for it. > > Did you just assume it'd work? Is there some presumption that it should > work by convention? I've never seen this stipulated. > See RFC 2142: "3. BUSINESS-RELATED MAILBOX NAMES These names are related to an organization's line-of-business activities." … "SUPPORT Customer Service Problems with product or service" > > Perhaps start at the Gmail help centre. https://support.google.com/mai > l/?hl=en#topic=7065107 ?? > > Public mailing lists such as this one shouldn't be doubling for > vendor-specific technical support. It is of some note to mailop, as far as that google does not comply with RFC2142. beyond that? yeah, not in scope. Note how Bill didn't ask any questions, just a brief (probably unneeded) explanation as to how he discovered it, and the general notification. > > > > On 21/01/2018 10:02 AM, Bill Campbell wrote: > >> I tried sending email to supp...@gmail.com asking how to get >> access to a gmail account where 3rd party authorization doesn't >> work as the 3rd party is no longer available. >> >> The message bounced as an invalid account. >> >> Bill >> > > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop >
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
