December 15, 2017 1:12 PM, "Noel Butler" wrote:
On 15/12/2017 09:27, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote: On 12/14/2017
03:28 PM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:My point is that -all is policy, and
most people ignore the policy portions of SPF because it completely fails a lot
of forwarding cases.
Every postmaster (or organization behind them) has the prerogative to run their
mail server(s) the way that they want to. Agreed, if I publish a -all (which I
do and have done for a very very long time), I expect receivers doing SPF
processing of my domains messages, to honor that! Who the hell are they to
assume they know my network and its senders better than me. You really don't
have any rights over an email once delivered, and given just how hard it is to
ensure your SPF is followed in these days of mobile devices I don't think you
should. Expect the receiving mail platform to use the published policy to score
a message sure, but not to dictate delivery.
Sorry if this point has been made before.
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
