Michael Peddemors wrote: > Spam detection usually comes in via SMTP, not IMAP ;) >
I get that, but somebody asked me offlist what our IMAP implementation looked like. > What is is the backend MTA? Postfix? SendMail? It's postfix, but it really shouldn't matter what our MTA is if we're looking for an appliance or service that sits in front of our MTA, shouldn't it? > Are you looking to offer this for free, or as a value add? > Value add > You can also reach me offlist for suggestions.. > Ok thx - mark > On 17-07-18 08:50 AM, Mark Jeftovic wrote: >> >> Thanks to all who replied thus far, to answer a few questions: >> >> * our IMAP implementation is dovecot >> * approx. 25K mail boxes but they will not all be using this, most won't >> >> And a follow-up question: >> >> * anybody familiar with zerospam.ca ? >> >> Will summarize thread. >> >> - mark >> >> >> Mark Jeftovic wrote: >>> Hi, we're looking for recommendations for an antispam service we can >>> layer in front of our hosted IMAP offering. >>> >>> >>> We've tried a few services so far and our testing has found serious >>> deficiencies. >>> >>> Requirements: >>> >>> * hosted or virtual appliance >>> * quarantine with management (auto-purge options) >>> * prefer content based filtering over RBLs, having serious >>> false-positive issues with RBLs - bonus for being able to enable/disable >>> individual RBL's by domain/user >>> * tag-only mode >>> * user defined white-lists >>> * anti-virus filters >>> * API >>> * white-labelling a plus but not a requirement >>> >>> Any feedback, experiences recommendations would be appreciated. >>> >>> - mark >>> >> > > > -- Mark Jeftovic <mar...@easydns.com> Founder & CEO, easyDNS Technologies Inc. http://www.easyDNS.com _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
