Le Mon, May 15, 2017 at 12:34:30PM -0400, D'Arcy Cain [da...@vex.net] a écrit: [... broken SPF ...] > > My personal preference is to just bounce it and make them fix their > records but it is becoming a support problem because the senders are > not reading the bounce message which explains the problem and has a > link to a page with more detail. They simply contact our users > saying that it must be our problem.
You could soft-bounce with 4xx error code stating the problem encountered. The "good" sending administrators would then view their outgoing queues growing, have a clue about the problem, correct it, and let the spool catch-up. For the "bad" ones, their queues would pile up anf finally bounce to their users. Else, I would consider "broken SPF" as "no SPF" rather than fail. -- Dominique Rousseau Neuronnexion, Prestataire Internet & Intranet 21 rue Frédéric Petit - 80000 Amiens tel: 03 22 71 61 90 - fax: 03 22 71 61 99 - http://www.neuronnexion.coop _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
