Al Iverson <aiver...@spamresource.com> said: >> best done by implementing SRS/PRVS/BATV: it creates time-limited > Do this for years on a high traffic environment with lots of mail and lots > of users and lots of individual bounces to track, then you'll find that > you're fending off zillions of connection attempts, spammers trying to > deliver to those one time addresses, as they get out in the wild, end up > found by spambots, etc. ...
Is that also a gold mine of information? What fraction of that crap comes from ESPs as compared to spambots/zombies? What fraction of the zombies are already on major block lists? Are there occasional legitimate attempts to use a stale address? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
