On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Renaud Allard via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> I never heard of truncate DNSBL before but it's easy to get over 95% > spam if they have only a few "sniffers", just send one unique message > looking spammy to their "sniffers", and you are good to go with 100% spam. > They also claim to need enough data to make a determination, so presumably 1 message would not get you listed. Thanks to all who responded. It seems that there is no observable impact from that list, and we "timed out" and are no longer listed.
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
