DKIM is relatively easy to do, just get on with the program... It seems very unlikely that for 50 messages a day, Yahoo would spend some resources to help you not to have to spend some resources to enable DKIM.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Carl Byington <c...@five-ten-sg.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > I am trying to help a very small isp with a yahoo.com delivery issue. > They are getting "421 4.7.0 [TS02] Messages from 208.88.52.225 > temporarily deferred - 4.16.56.1; see > http://postmaster.yahoo.com/errors/421-ts02.html"; errors. > > Volume is less than 50 total messages per day going to yahoo.com > addresses. Clients use their own domain names. > > https://help.yahoo.com/kb/account/yahoo-complaint-feedback-loop- > service-faq-sln26007.html says "For bulk commercial senders or senders > of transactional mail, DomainKeys or DKIM is the best option. ISPs > should contact Yahoo for other options.", but gives no contact address > for an ISP. Is that a mistake? Is the Yahoo feedback loop only available > for folks that DKIM sign outbound mail? > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEAREKAAYFAlb5qy0ACgkQL6j7milTFsHaOQCbBS7FforwdSURhEDfSn9p6ujK > n+wAoIFRSmuzrqFH+pmcHDS5luzS5koJ > =79zs > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop >
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
