On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Michelle Sullivan <miche...@sorbs.net> wrote: > If you're doing it just on the subject, ok I'll go with that..
There's an MSc Thesis by Chris Kopsidas (then a student at the University of Athens, back in 2012) where we worked explicitly on subject lines of spams that went past SpamAssassin, RBLs and a few other filters. I thought at the time that since a Subject line is considerably smaller than most message bodies, trying to infer spam or ham based on the subject would be faster than checking the whole message. I never really got it to production since I had more pressing problems to deal with, but if anyone is interested, I can put you in contact with both the guy that implemented the idea and his (then) supervisor. -- "If technology is your thing plan to die reading manuals" --Gene Woolsey _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
