On 24/10/2015 00:00, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Renaud Allard <ren...@allard.it>
wrote:
So maybe all of this *** stuff is not so bad if it brings more
verifications
which can be used to restore reliability of email delivery.
We're going on at least 15 years now of people making that similar
statement. :-)
I find it ironic that one of the sites on dmarcs web page that does
reflector tests actually fails sending its report because of SPF :)
5.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record
(softfail)
/me looks at not so un lockingtheinbox
--
If you have the urge to reply to all rather than reply to list, you best
read http://members.ausics.net/qwerty/
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
