On 15-09-15 11:44 AM, Michael Wise wrote:
No, it doesn't.
After all, technically Message-ID is an optional field.
I bitch and moan about that, but nobody cares... They all end up pointing to,
"SHOULD", and I can't really do anything but :'(
And the information is not pertinent.
If this ML is going to become a forum for reporting spam, I'm gone.
Aloha,
Michael.
Well, this thread has nothing to do with Spam :)
However, if it will help you in your reports, the RFC carefully covers
the usage of Message-ID IF you ARE using one. It should only be created
either by the original sender, or the 'first' server to accept the message.
Something seems amiss that you might want to escalate to your team, (by
the way, also has two Return-Path's) and the way the relay is operating.
In this case, the original message is somehow routed to a last hop
hotmail server, which is probably getting this via a non-standard relay
method..
However, I have now done my 'friendly' duty and let you know, as I am
sure it is affecting lots' of your customers..
Thread closed ..
--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
"LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada
This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
