On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Brandon Long <bl...@google.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Jim Popovitch <jim...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Brandon Long <bl...@google.com> wrote: >> > There's magic sauce to try and split hairs, and it's not perfect. >> >> > Others have implied that mailop is unlikely to change their behavior with > regards to handling DMARC, but my trolling through the online archive > didn't gain me any insight into this. I think that's unfortunate as more > domains enable it, and if Google's handling of DMARC gets stricter, then my > ability to participate here will be impacted. > > > This list runs mailman 2.1.15, they need at least 2.1.16 to have options to deal with DMARC. mailman 2.1.18 and above offers a wide range of options for all tastes. So it all starts by some upgrade, if only to catch up on bugs and security vulnerabilities: https://launchpad.net/mailman/2.1/2.1.20, http://www.cvedetails.com/product/913/GNU-Mailman.html?vendor_id=72
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
