I am not sure I have ever understood completely the embedding or not setting, 
nor the inline or not setting. Is there somewhere that describes what all that 
does so I can decide the best choice for me?

Thanks,
P

> On Jun 26, 2017, at 10:21 AM, Benny Kjær Nielsen <mailingl...@freron.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> On 23 Jun 2017, at 5:30, Padraic Renaghan wrote:
> 
> Benny, thinking it might be nice to run this filter when the reply to an 
> existing message is created, so the reply does carry-forward all the junk. 
> What would be the right event to hook my new filter into for that?
> 
> There's no simple answer for that. If you don't use the HTML embedding 
> features of MailMate then sanitize_canonical could be used (which expects 
> plain text input/output) to add an extra filter. If you do use HTML embedding 
> then there's no perfect candidate, but embed_html could probably be used if 
> using a CSS inliner (I can perhaps look into changing this to be more 
> logical/useful). The main problem is that the plain text script is still 
> needed and the plain text and the HTML scripts should remove the same content 
> -- which could be very difficult.
> 
> It might be better/easier for you if HTML embedding allowed a mode where the 
> plain text variant was always based on converting HTML to plain text, but 
> this is not currently available.
> 
> In other words, I don't think this reply helps you much :)
> 
> -- 
> Benny
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mailmate mailing list
> mailmate@lists.freron.com
> https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
_______________________________________________
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate

Reply via email to