Hi, guys. I'm currently running Carbon copy as well as time machine. But I'm wondering why I'm doing that. Does it make any sense to run both since carbon copy will create a bootable disk and can also be scheduled just like time machine? It appears it's easier to do a restore with carbon copy; so is time machine really necessary if you have another backup solution? Thanks.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
