Hi,
I do quite a bit on my machine, especially in audio. I am learning the macand 
plan to do all my audio work on it.
Naama
On 25 Jun 2011, at 19:28, Neil Barnfather - TalkNav wrote:

> Naama,
> 
> you say you upgraded your iMac, and you are pleased with the results, how 
> much did you have in the past, what speed of RAM, which Mac do you have, what 
> bus speed, what processor, how fast was the spin speed on your hard drive, 
> what cache level etc.
> 
> you are implying that the pure RAM improvement made this difference, but the 
> implication is that you had a perfect machine and that the RAM slowed things 
> down, you may have had a lesser machine, and the RAM made things better for 
> you.
> 
> I'm not saying that you did not notice a benefit, but I'm saying that you 
> likely would have noted one no matter what component you upgraded.
> 
> what I am saying is that on a 2010 or even 2009 model Mac, with a good 
> specification all round, the difference in performance from 4Gb RAM to 
> anything above, will not be noticed by the average user whatsoever.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Neil Barnfather
> 
> Talks List Administrator
> Twitter @neilbarnfather
> 
> TalkNav is a Nuance, Code Factory and Sendero dealer, for all your
> accessible phone, PDA and GPS related enquiries visit www.talknav.com
> 
> URL: - www.talknav.com
> e-mail: - serv...@talknav.com
> Phone: - +44  844 999 4199
> 
> 
> 
> On 25 Jun 2011, at 13:58, Naama Shang wrote:
> 
> I upgraded my iMac to 8gigs of ram and I am not sorry in the learst.
> Ram, compared to other things,is relatively inexpensive, and the results are 
> well worth it.
> Naama
> On 25 Jun 2011, at 08:48, CJ Daniel wrote:
> 
>> Kliff,
>> 
>> I was a programmer for years, starting back in the mid-80's.  I got my first 
>> PC in, about, '90 or '91, when we were all using DOS 3.5.  I've gone through 
>> all the successions.  I.E. various versions of DOS, Windows 3.1, '95, '98 
>> SE, ME, XP, Vista & now Apple Mac.  I suppose there can come a time when a 
>> user is buying more memory than they really need.  But, through out all of 
>> those experiences, the rule-of-thumb where memory was concerned, especially 
>> for those users who were adding the huge overhead of screen reading 
>> technology, was, "the more the merrier."  In fact, my understanding for the 
>> new OS upgrade called Lion is that you need @ least 2GB to run it.  I'm 
>> looking @ upgrading my 2 Gigs to as much as Little Mama will hold.  My 
>> advice is, shove as much as you can in there & just enjoy the results.
>> 
>> CJ
>> 
>> 
>> On Jun 24, 2011, at 9:24 PM, Kliph&Sharrie wrote:
>> 
>>> Okay, I am still on a few windows screen readers lists, since I teach a few 
>>> basic classes about JFW and know a lot about the windows side of things.  
>>> Anyways, someone said on this list that the average blind user needs no 
>>> more than 4 gigs of ram, at best anything over 8 would be a waste.  I'm no 
>>> exburt, but I have done a little research, and googling and have found that 
>>> the more  ram you have, the smoother your system will run, mac or PC.  This 
>>> person seem to think even if you had a fast processor, that spending money 
>>> on ram was a waste.  Now I will admitt, that apple is a little pricy when 
>>> it comes to ram, but there are third party sellers out there with 
>>> compatable memory for just about any system.  Thoughts?  Oh, 1 more thing 
>>> this person said, that the only way more than 4 gigs would be necessary is 
>>> if you were doing some high quality video or audio editting.  What do you 
>>> all think or know about these numbers and comments?
>>> 
>>> Sent from Minister Miller's IPhone
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to