I certainly will, and I hope others will too. I know a lot of people at
Serotek, including the president of the company.
I certainly don't mind calling Mr. Calvo.
Just let me say though that I do think it is a good app; it just needs more
work, and more security.
For version 1.0 it isn't bad though.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ricardo Walker" <rwalker...@gmail.com>
To: <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: Docuscan Plus not quite ready for primetime
Hi,
I hope you and others are doing more than hoping this is fixed. Write to
the developers and make them aware of your likes and dislikes. Just making
your feelings known on list want accomplish much. I'm not talking about you
specifically keep in mind, just this list in general. Make your complaints,
and suggestions count.
JMO
Ricardo Walker
rwalker...@gmail.com
Twitter, Skype, and AIM: rwalker296
www.mobileaccess.org
On Apr 30, 2011, at 1:18 AM, David Tanner wrote:
It does a nice job, and it really isn't that slow on my MacBook Pro, but I
wish that it could save to the computer instead of having to save to the
cloud first. And, I definitely am disappointed that one has to be
connected to the internet to get a document recognized. It should be
possible to scan, recognize, read, and save without having to have an
internet connection, since it is not always possible to be connected to
the internet when you may need to scan and recognize text on your
computer.
I really hope this is fixed before too long.
Otherwise, I am pretty well satisfied as far as it goes to this point.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ashley Cox"
<ashleycox...@googlemail.com>
To: <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: Docuscan Plus not quite ready for primetime
Yes, I agree with you. Having tested it, it's a little better than what i
thought it would be, but why can't programs scan on my local computer?
why is it, these days, everything has to be done in the cloud?
ash
On 29/04/2011 16:00, Ronald McEwan wrote:
AFter playing with this for a while, my oppinion is that it needs some
work, or just perhaps more power in the cloud.
I can scan a document and wait and wait and wait for it. I finally give
up and then scan it again and it works right away.
I am using simple scan. Although I think I have seen this issue in
continuous read.
In the Journey,
Ron
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
