Hi,

I totally agree with you, but the point was that there are only 12 satellites 
being picked up at any time however the channel count, so until the full 66 
channels are being used at full potential with 66 satellites i don't need that 
power, which itself would also suck up more energy.

I don't believe either that 66 satellites would be roaming around an arc of 
about an 8th of the planet's perimeter.

It would be like using 66 processors to try to increase broadband speed on a 
adsl which is limited by the internet backbone Of your district.value 


Best regards



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to