I have a juno G,  great machine.  Especially if you expand the ram.
On Sep 15, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Chris Blouch wrote:

> My old Ensoniq ESQ1 has been replaced by a Roland Juno-G but the ESQ1 is 
> still in the basement somewhere. Weighs about 30-40 pounds so it wasn't fun 
> lugging around. I remember having a lot of fun with a Yamaha DX7 in the early 
> 80s making lots of interesting but not do musical sounds with it. Now days 
> there are kids and family life outside of work so not much noodling with macs 
> and music.
> 
> I still have some old PowerMac 9500s that I use for firewalls of all things 
> since they have no command line to hack into. As one dies I just grab another 
> from the pile.
> 
> CB
> 
> On 9/13/10 7:24 PM, Scott Granados wrote:
>> Speaking of old Mac gear, I know the Synclavier has been reworked around 
>> Modern Intel Macs now.  I wonder if you could grab an old post pro SD or 
>> 9600 from Ebay and use it with Voice over.  I saw one from Lucass Film on 
>> ebay for under 10 grand and I think you can get one from synclavier.com for 
>> under 25 grand which might osund like a lot but they were 750 large back in 
>> the day.
>> 
>> 
>> I used to work with one (synclavier 6400) and loved it!
>> 
>> On Sep 13, 2010, at 2:09 PM, Chris Blouch wrote:
>> 
>>> Right, this was just straight audio recording. Any processing was done with 
>>> outboard gear or post processed. Software synths and effects can definitely 
>>> chew up a lot of CPU. While I haven't played with this a lot I would assume 
>>> rendering out the processed track to a new track would free up some 
>>> resources. Back then we had a 32-channel analog Mackie fed into a Mac 
>>> ProTools rig. At home I was running a little MOTU 8-channel firewire box 
>>> with their Sound Desk software. Haven't played with it in years so I don't 
>>> know if they even make it anymore or if it would work with OSX. Someday I 
>>> should put the stuff I don't use up on ebay, just too much bother and would 
>>> anyone still want a Emu Proteus MIDI box or a DAT recorder anymore :)
>>> 
>>> CB
>>> 
>>> On 9/13/10 5:02 PM, Cameron wrote:
>>>> Hi.  it depends on what sort of recording we're referring to; If we are
>>>> talking about audio tracks, or, soft synths/virtual instruments that use
>>>> wave streaming etc.  the latter is where your processor and ram as well as
>>>> hd rpm really become important.
>>>> 
>>>> Are you a voiceover user by the way?  If so, the current versions of logic
>>>> are not accessible.  Pro tools is accessible for audio, but not for midi.
>>>> For example, the event list editor is not accessible with vo.  Hopefully
>>>> that will be addressed in a future update.
>>>> 
>>>> Cameron.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chris Blouch
>>>> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 4:51 PM
>>>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> Subject: Re: duo core or i5 in mbp
>>>> 
>>>>   Back in the day, like 10 years ago, I was able to record 8 concurrent
>>>> tracks on an old powerMac g4. I would suspect even mundane hardware
>>>> today could handle all but the most extreme cases.
>>>> 
>>>> CB
>>>> 
>>>> On 9/8/10 6:08 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
>>>>> hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'll be using this for lectures, some language stuff, and also
>>>>> possibly for recording music with logic or garage band down the line.
>>>>> My concern is future proofing. Unfortunately, you can't get the 7200
>>>>> rpm harddrives in the 13 inch mbp's or I'd just go duo with a better
>>>>> harddrive.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Gotta love apple's packaged deal options, instead of letting you
>>>>> configure your heart out.
>>>>> MJ
>>>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to