Good morning everyone, I wanna explain it my comments earlier today. The first issue with being more infusion currently is it appears that Broadcom is in the process of closing being fusion as a product down, removing it from the marketplace. The company appears want to focus on corporate infrastructure because that's where they're making money. I have received emails from the divestiture office, which means in British business terms means liquidate as enclosed down. The email discusses what they're going to do with my "personal data apparently under European law they have to tell you that they're holding this and will use it for marketing purposes. But the email if I am remembering it clearly indicate that the product will go away but my day is being mine while they close this all down apparently. One other sign that this may need me the case is that the minute I moved to start beta testing Mac OS sequoia being fusion stopped working almost completely. And I'm not sure as I mentioned earlier in this email that.com <http://that.com/> wants to put any resources into keeping a product alive that apparently isn't making the money.
On the other hand Parallels accessibility has gotten significantly better for us. The accessibility issues that led me to switch from parallels to being more fusion have disappeared almost. One accessibility with jaws for windows Version 2024 seems to work and 98% of the case is where I use it. The only issue appears to be is when Microsoft Outlook, there seems to be a issue where outlook is collapsed and I can't get it expanded you know to focus on each agenda message easily. Although it appears that I can track this by using the”Vo” keys. When it comes to NVDA there appears to be no real issues. In terms of being able to use that window screen reader as a back up solution. The only parallels issue that I've noticed is that sometimes applications appear in different windows, so one must use the dock to move between the windows Applications if they were actual Mac applications in order to gain focus on the active application. But the way to stop applications, is to bring up the Force quit window, and then pick the windows application that you wish to force quit. It seems to work 100% of the time. In other words what I'm trying to say here is when using parallels it functions like windows but you should always remember your voiceover key strokes. In addition you need to remember how to manage, and or force quit Applications in terms of the manner one would quit one away applications. Another Plus for us, is the fact that you can login into windows in the same manner you log into your Mac if you have touch ID. The company has made a process for buying use your touch ID to automatically enter your Windows password. This means that you're like me and I've had to demonstrate using windows in a virtual machine you don't have to have people watching you enter your password and windows. All they see is you using the touch ID key. I do realize that this is not a free option, it's in fact $120 US per year. If you're using a silicon Mac this apparently appears to be the only option for paying for parallels, but they do issue updates which of course means that are granted free during the life of your subscription. Overall things are very accessible. Bottom line for now if you have a silicone based Mac in our planning on upgrading next month in terms of the operating system, parallel appears to be the way to go or virtualized windows. I hope this lengthy explanation helps explain things as I currently understand them. Please feel free to ask questions, about accessibility and how one sucks this up. But just understand that the question relates to the beta of macOS unless the answer is already publicly available meaning it's out there in the press or in the community in general I believe I can't discuss any of this until Michael Sequoia is released. Which should be I'm gonna guess either sometime late in September or early October. But much of what is known about the improvements but the general public is already common knowledge so unless the question really does deal with something that really is still considered a beta issue there is likely to not be a problem discussing on this list. Final thoughts please be aware that I dictated this to my Mac so there are still may be some spelling, and or syntax errors but this should be understandable. And as I mentioned earlier this morning my thoughts are certainly a personal opinion nature that you don't reflect views of the national Federation of the blind, or the views of the national Federation of the blind deaf blind division. Maurice Mines. -- The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries list. If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor. You can reach mark at: mk...@ucla.edu and your owner is Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at caraqu...@caraquinn.com The archives for this list can be searched at: http://www.mail-archive.com/macvisionaries@googlegroups.com/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/macvisionaries/F502BA2D-6BF3-4936-845E-1F794B56CE38%40gmail.com.
