A difference wifi charging might make in case of emergencys, My question is how do you charge your phone if there is a major power outage in your town during a storm or something?
If there is no power to your house or say star bucks, then how do you charge? No power no charging. I'm one of those who has no landline phone, I have only a mobile My mobile has a geographically diverted landline number to my mobile but still I'm scscrewed if there is a natural disaster.. -----Original Message----- From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Karen Lewellen Sent: Thursday, 10 August 2017 4:23 PM To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: How iPhone 8 could change the wireless charging landscape - CNET My goodness! Thanks for that read. I am thinking how helpful wireless charging may be in emergency preparedness situations. Although I may be missing something obvious, the article hints that the wireless charging runs on radio waves? As in electromagnetic spectrum? A few years back we had an ice storm where the power was out for three days, much longer in some parts of the city. Needless to say people tried charging products at their local Starbucks, but to prevent a strain even that had to stop. i still have, and will keep as long as possible, a land line phone....and a Sony walkman. had I not, I would have been totally housebound, and without any information about what was happening, in December, on the top floor of a building with no heat. I felt for people stuck with only cell phones, imagine what a difference wireless charging might make During flooding? Kare On Wed, 9 Aug 2017, M. Taylor wrote: > CNET News - Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 4:00 AM How iPhone 8 could > change the wireless charging landscape - CNET As we approach the > expected September iPhone event, the gadget world is abuzz with > questions: Will there be two new iPhones or three? How much will the > presumed high-end OLED model cost? Will facial recognition fully > replace Touch ID, or merely be an alternative? And: will the iPhone > finally get wireless charging? > But that last one is a loaded question because "wireless" charging is > in the eye of the beholder. > Sure, you can place a Samsung Galaxy and many other Android phones > onto a charging pad without having to plug the phone into any charging > cable. And those same pads are increasingly built into countertops at > coffee shops, burger joints and even furniture you can buy at Ikea. > But those pads still need to be plugged into a wall outlet. The wire > is still there, it's just not attached directly to the phone. > > Some current iPhone battery cases, like Mophie's Juice Pack, include > wireless charging compatibility. > Sarah Tew/CNET > That's a roundabout way of saying "wireless charging" is basically a > misnomer. Except when it isn't: "True" wireless charging -- in which > batteries get juiced up at distances measured in meters, not > centimeters -- is a real-world technology, too. > Wireless charging over a distance could be the real tech game changer, > allowing us to juice up our phones as soon as we walk into a room. The > technology is also a boon to the ever-increasing number of smart > devices in our lives, from portable speakers to hearing aids. It just > needs to get over the pesky questions over whether it's safe -- and > actually show up in a mass-market consumer device. > So, before we posit the question as to whether the next iPhones will > include wireless charging, let's start by untangling the different > technologies that Apple might incorporate. > Inductive charging: Qi vs. Powermat > Widely used for years in cordless electric toothbrushes, inductive > charging is the most common technology employed in most of today's "wireless" > charging devices and accessories. There are two major standards in the > space: Qi -- named for a Chinese word that means energy and is > pronounced "chee" -- and Powermat. > Both standards are also working to incorporate magnetic resonance > technology, which could charge over distances of up to 4 centimeters. > That would, for instance, mean that aligning your phone to the > charging pad "sweet spot" would be less of a hit-and-miss affair, or > that the charging pads could be hidden behind thin layers of wood or plastic. > > The Samsung Galaxy S8 recharging on a Powermat inductive charger at a > Manhattan Starbucks. > Sarah Tew/CNET > Qi has been incorporated into phones from a variety of manufacturers, > and McDonald's has built Qi-compatible chargers into the furniture at > its restaurants. Powermat-infused tables, meanwhile, can be found in > some Starbucks and airport lounges. > The rivals are backed by two opposing standards organizations, too: > The Wireless Power Consortium for Qi, and the AirFuel Alliance for > Powermat. The latter was formed when Powermat and its Power Matters > Alliance merged with a third, rival wireless standard (confusingly > called the Alliance for Wireless Power, or A4WP) in 2014. > The good news is that the rivalry has been less of a zero-sum game in > recent years. Samsung, for one, has made its recent high-end Galaxy > phones (including the S7 and S8) compatible with both inductive > charging standards, so you can juice it up on a Qi-powered counter at > McDonald's and a Powermat-powered one at Starbucks. > 'True' wireless charging: Energous and Powercast Forget about 4 > centimeters. How about charging from a distance of 4 meters? > Or anywhere in an average-size room? > It's a pretty recent concept, but companies like Energous and > Powercast are producing technology that can more accurately be called > wire-free. Both use radio frequency (RF) energy, a charging method > that works similarly to Wi-Fi, that enables devices to charge when > within the range of a power transmitter. > Energous is the developer of WattUp, the wire-free technology that the > company claims is capable of charging anything from a mobile device to > various wearables like a hearing aid when located up to 15 feet (about > 4.5 > meters) from the transmitter. The first wire-free transmitter is > expected to hit the market before the end of the year, according to CEO > Stephen R. > Rizzone. > "Besides mobility, the idea of charging at a distance is very, very > important to IoT devices," said Rizzone. "Now what's happened, is that > you no longer have to run a cable to them, nor do you have to have a > large battery, that either has to be replaced or somehow recharged. > You can have a much smaller battery because you're continually getting > power from these transmitters." > > Powercast demonstrated its distance-charging tech in New York City > earlier this summer. > Brianne Garrett/CNET > But there's a common concern: is it safe? The Federal Communications > Commission enforces the standards of the Food and Drug Administration > that determine how much power is safe enough to be absorbed by human > tissue -- and Rizzone says Energous is "very, very close" to getting > its first FCC approval. > Powercast, the other true wire-free company, has made some greater strides. > The company's Powercaster transmitters are already approved by the > FCC, and they've been available since 2010 -- but only in industrial, > commercial and military markets. > PowerSpot, Powercast's new standalone transmitter created for consumer > electronics, is still not available to consumers and isn't yet FCC approved. > The company hopes to also bring it to the market before the end of the year. > "The goal is for consumers to simply place or hang all enabled items > for recharging within range of a PowerSpot in their home or other > public places," said Charlie Greene, chief operating & technical > officer of Powercast. > Which way will Apple go? > All of this brings us back to the iPhone issue. Will Apple finally > jump on board the wireless power bandwagon? If so, which horse will it > back: Qi, Powermat -- or door no. 3? (You can buy third-party cases > for the iPhone that enable wireless charging, but the feature has yet > to be built in.) To date, Apple has two products that use inductive > charging: the Apple Watch and the AirPods wireless headphones. Both of > them, however, come with their own chargers, and neither appears to > work with any third-party wireless chargers -- Qi, Powermat or otherwise. > And while Apple has a penchant for proprietary standards -- iPhones > use Lightning cables rather than the emerging USB-C standard, for > instance -- the news in February that Apple had joined the Qi-backed > Wireless Power Consortium has some declaring that group the winner. > However, Apple's statement at the time was more equivocal: "Apple is > joining the Wireless Power Consortium to be able to participate and > contribute ideas to the open, collaborative development of future > wireless charging standards." (Neither Apple nor Qi responded to our > requests for comment earlier this week.) > > The "wireless" inductive charger attaches to the Apple Watch via a magnet. > Sarah Tew/CNET > If Apple were to go with Qi, Powermat has implied it would do whatever > it takes to be compatible. Powermat "will continue to innovate and > develop new products and technology supporting all devices coming into > the market" the company said in a statement. "We recognize Apple's > ability to bring wireless charging into mainstream by the sheer volume > of iPhones in the market." Put another way: Powermat wants to ensure > that partners like Starbucks can service the tens of millions -- and > eventually hundreds of millions -- of iPhone owners, just as they do for > Android fans. > Could Apple wow the world with true long-distance wireless charging? > Energous CEO Rizzone has long touted a "top five" consumer electronics > partner, and the company received a $10 million investment from Apple > component supplier Dialog Semiconductor. Leapfrogging straight from no > wireless charging to true wireless charging would be an impressive > feat, but a material product from a possible Apple/Energous > partnership could also still be years away -- if it ever materializes at all. > The good news is that the wait for Apple's wireless charging plans > will be short. If the company sticks to its normal schedule, the new > iPhones should be announced in the first two weeks of September. > (Whatever wireless charging feature is announced, though, may be > delayed a few more weeks, according to a rumor from July.) The bad > news? It may be more convenient, but wireless charging is far less > efficient than a good old wired charger. A CNET test found that the > Galaxy > S8 took 3.5 hours to charge inductively, more than the typical 2 hours > it takes with a standard USB-C cable. > But fans of quick wired charging won't have to worry. Unlike the > headphone jack, we expect the iPhone's Lightning port won't be going > away anytime soon. > > Original Article at: > https://www.cnet.com/news/apple-iphone-8-wireless-charging-possibiliti > es/#ft > ag=CAD590a51e > > > -- > The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries > list. > > If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if > you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or > moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. > > Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor. You can reach > mark at: macvisionaries+modera...@googlegroups.com and your owner is > Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at caraqu...@caraquinn.com > > The archives for this list can be searched at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/macvisionaries@googlegroups.com/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries list. If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor. You can reach mark at: macvisionaries+modera...@googlegroups.com and your owner is Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at caraqu...@caraquinn.com The archives for this list can be searched at: http://www.mail-archive.com/macvisionaries@googlegroups.com/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
