I've tried Parallels before, like 3 months ago, but no luck with VO. Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 27, 2015, at 7:42 AM, Scott Granados <scott.grana...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I like this response. Thank you! > > Definitely well thought out. > > So you raise very good points. I’m just going to counter and say that it > seems to me like they streamline the code and optimize performance to the > latest hardware and software out there but that’s a marginal gain and I’d > wonder if the user really experiences much improvement. > > Some of the updates to Fusion I’ve done really did seem to help with > things like battery life and other tangible benefits but using your logic, > why do we really need a hypervisor at all. Why can’t some means of > compartmentalizing operating systems and running them in parallel be handled > right in the OS or in hardware. Good point! > > Since you mentioned parallels? Is that accessible now? I always went with > fusion because I had experienced parallels and had bad luck with VO. Has > this changed? > > Do you have a hypervisor you like to use that’s better than fusion or do you > just suck it up and pay the money for fusion like I do? > > Thanks for the good points to think about. > > > >> On Aug 27, 2015, at 8:37 AM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu <listse...@me.com> wrote: >> >> But the emulated hardware is sufficient to run Win10. Why on earth is a PC >> emulator struggling to support a newer OS when that OS would run on >> contemporary hardware of the same age as the current version of VMWare? >> >> Even if there are valid reasons, it’s been less than 12 months. VMWare >> makes money from its server business and their desktop products are fairly >> marginal. And it has competition from other vendors, notably Parallels on >> the Mac (which plays the same silly game), VirtualBox (less good but free) >> and the bare-metal hypervisors which everybody is just giving away now >> because the technology won’t fly unless it’s free. It’s a good time to be a >> desktop Linux user so you can use KVM. :) >> >> So yeah, grrr. Bloody annoying. Better get out my wallet. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "MacVisionaries" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
