Some numbers for your edification. You have posted 12 times to my 3
today. Who is wasting whose time? (smiles)
From E.T.'s Keyboard...
ancient.ali...@icloud.com
Many believe that we have been visited
in the past. What if it were true?
On 8/26/2015 11:32 AM, Scott Granados wrote:
And see instead of wasting your time and mine by writing that you could have
hit the delete key, taken less than 500 milliseconds and moved on.
On Aug 26, 2015, at 2:30 PM, E.T. <ancient.ali...@icloud.com> wrote:
A mail filter is not workable in all situations such as the one under heavy
discussion. The reasons given are clear. Your comment was not necessary.
From E.T.'s Keyboard...
ancient.ali...@icloud.com
Many believe that we have been visited
in the past. What if it were true?
On 8/26/2015 11:10 AM, Scott Granados wrote:
This is what I was suggesting but several folks got their panties in a bunch
and feel that filtering is unacceptable. They’d rather be spoon fed I suppose
than work their own silverware.
Good point though
On Aug 26, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Eric Oyen <eric.o...@icloud.com> wrote:
may I offer a suggestion? there are mail filters that can be applied from the
end user. Most mail clients can actually do this based on a number of criteria.
So, if someone uses a foul tongue and makes threats, just filter their mail
into the trash based on that offenders email address, or based on a list of
words that are offensive. THe offender will realize with alacrity that his
messages are being ignore and will go elsewhere.
Just a thought.
-eric
On Aug 26, 2015, at 10:56 AM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
Of course, as always, it helps to remember that if nobody replied to the
abuser, we wouldn’t have these issues. But it also helps to know that a
moderator can do this quickly in response to a general consensus or clear harm
being done, and that, for better or worse, people will respond angrily to
threads and contribute to their derailment. I see no reason why anybody’s
freedoms should be impacted by such moderation, only the benefits that come
from a more efficient filter on the list mail than would be achievable
otherwise by individual members, especially when the only tools available to
them are on their devices.
So, as I said previously, I regard this as a matter of administration, not
ethics. Having a moderator around is simply important for damage
control—nothing more.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
