I might be speaking out of lack of knowledge, but HTML generally ignores line 
breaks in the BODY  and instead uses a specific tag to indicate breaks and/or 
change of paragraph. 

I have not looked specifically at HTML based mail, but I would expect the same 
behavior. 

Also, at least in Outlook 2010 and Outloook 2003  when one uses plain text 
option, one also specifics a line length that defaults to 72 characters.

Best wishes,

Jonathan



On Nov 11, 2014, at 6:56 AM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu <listse...@me.com> wrote:

> Hi Grant,
> 
> I actually heard on the grape vine that it is OS X that altered its behaviour 
> to match Outlook's, rather than the other way around, but the end result is 
> the same: both clients break the rules.  You're right, there may be a 
> preference to set this behaviour in Outlook, although it strikes me as 
> unlikely.
> 
> Essentially what's happening is that every paragraph of text is sent as a 
> very long single line, which is MIME-encoded to get it through the email 
> system, the idea being that different sizes of screens make it desirable of 
> different clients to wrap lines at appropriate columns instead of requiring 
> the messages themselves contain line breaks.  However well-intentioned, 
> though, this means that any email client which doesn't know about this 
> particular "Format" may do the wrong thing--it may make a long line 
> scrollable horizontally, clipping lines, or if it doesn't support MIME, it 
> will show encoding characters.  It also interferes big time with quoting in 
> conversations; if an email client in a conversation tries to respond to such 
> a message, strange (and wrong) things happen: only the first line of a 
> paragraph is quoted, or an entire line is quoted and different programs show 
> it differently.  It's all a mess.  The standards group that specified email 
> has long provided a solution compatible with all software, which encodes 
> paragraph by leaving trailing spaces at the ends of lines intended to be 
> continued (a clever and elegant solution), but of course Microsoft and Apple 
> instead chose to simply rely on the fact that people don't do much quoting, 
> and that most software wraps the lines because it already supports dynamic 
> resizing or HTML, both of which are typical of graphical email applications.  
> The end result is that if you participate on any technical mailing list using 
> Apple Mail and most likely Outlook, you will get shouted at by lots of people 
> who are either using web archives, or Usenet news gateways, since their email 
> clients and interfaces are usually the lowest common denominator, work with 
> minimal resources, and are generally both the most flexible and the least 
> contemporary.  Apple and Microsoft simply want to change the behaviour by 
> fiat, but many technical participants simply can't accommodate it.
> 
> If I were you, I'd change at least one thing: go to plain text from HTML.  
> Unless you intend to actually send formatted messages, plain text is fine, 
> even for bullet points and other Unicode characters.
> 
> Cheers,
> Sabahattin
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to