Hmm. I bet getting rid of a lot of legacy and multiple-CPU binaries is the bulk of the savings.
CB Brent Harding wrote: > Getting half the disk space back is one reason of it's own. Will it run > faster, probably I would imagine. I wonder how they compress half of it out > without losing half the features? I suppose the old PowerPC code takes just > as much as the intel, so going universal must double the size. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "william lomas" <lomaswill...@googlemail.com> > To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by > the blind" <disc...@macvisionaries.com> > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:25 AM > Subject: i wait to upgrade > > > >> hi all i will wait I think to upgrade and see what other users say >> regarding performance etc. if what we have now works and we are happy >> with its usage then why upgrade at present >> regards just my thoughts, will >> >> >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
