Hi,

Is that the study by the University of Verginia?

Regards,
Alex,


On 15-Jun-09, at 10:46 AM, Gary W. Kelly wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> Kara is correct.  For those of you attended CSUN in March, and recall
> the iVisit demonstration of SeeStar and SeeScan--well, you were
> watching a camera cellphone with less than 3 megapixels.  It could
> identify money, and while it is limited in how small print can be, it
> is surprisingly good.
>
> The difficulty for developers for the iPhone is the "crowd at the
> door". There are so many developers with good ideas, that Apple is
> limited in how much attention they can give individual developers.
> This is both good and bad news.   It means that the iPhone will not
> have everything at once, but it also means that once the flow of new
> widgets and systems start, it will flow well for a long time.
>
> The new iPhone has 256 mb of memory--double the current models, and a
> 600 mhz processor.  Even so, it will have difficulty doing the heavy
> lifting of processing OCR, or even doing recognition tasks.  The
> iVisit approach revealed at CSUN, depends on a data channel to connect
> to a desk server to do that processing intensive work. It is likely
> that will remain just as true of future iPhones for a while.
>
> Since some of the desirable applications will take a couple of years
> to have available to the public, there is plenty of time for an iPhone
> upgrade by then.  Remember, the life cycle of a cellphone is typically
> 18 months.
>
> The greater issues with doing any kind of recognition with a camera on
> a cellphone have to do with the human factors of how to aim the
> camera, and know the image is in the field.   The process requires a
> remote server to do the heavy lifting of recognition if you want more
> than minimal performance.  This means a data plan, and reception
> issues.  Even at 600 mhz, and 256 mb memory, resources are scant for
> serious OCR on the phone.  Think of doing that back in 1999 on your  
> PC.
>
> Another note of reality for this discussion is to realize that iPhones
> now are notorious for being power hungry.  If one uses an iPhone as
> many typical users do, the battery does *not* last through the day.
> There are iPhone kits to provide portable power on the go, to recharge
> the iPhone.
>
> The battery is the weak component. Yes, it would be wonderful to have
> all those hardware gadgets in one iPhone package, but currently, you
> can only expect to do that for about half a day.  If you want to use
> your phone after that, you will need to get more power for it.  It is
> not currently realistic to carry around your phone, and ask it to be a
> cellphone, a portable document reader, an email reader, book reader,
> music player, GPS navigator, money/object recognizer, color
> identifier, bar code/RFID reader, etc, and last for 10-12 hours a day
> while you are on the go, too.
>
> There are real trade-offs that will have to be made, and that
> balancing act takes time to play out.  I am currently participating in
> a study of "best practices" in cellphone design for persons who are
> blind.   We are finding that few phones running MobileSpeaks can
> survive a day without a recharge.  Cellphone companies fudge their
> numbers by turning out the backlight in 2 seconds, as on the BlackJack
> 2, and cutting system resources to the bone to make that 8 hours they
> want to advertise. When we go in, and reset it so it can work with
> MobileSpeaks, the additional overhead takes a big toll.  Just as the
> manuals say--running bluetooth uses more power, so does MobileSpeaks,
> or any other screen reading system.  GPS uses more power, and those
> cameras eat power at an incredible rate.   In my work with one
> application on a Mogul, I could drain the battery in about 2 hours at
> most.
>
> Relax, be patient, and enjoy Snow Leopard when it arrives.
> It may take time for iPhones, or any other phone to catch up to our
> dreams and desires.
>
> Gary
>
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to