i think this is really great. i can choose my play list an track for different work outs at gym or just relaxing in bed on on train journeys without having to scan through the whole library.
Ok so maybe i don't need 4gb. --- On Wed, 11/3/09, Scott Chesworth <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Scott Chesworth <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: what the point in that > To: [email protected] > Date: Wednesday, 11 March, 2009, 3:20 PM > Seconded. I want a talking classic as much as the next music > junkie, > but I doubt there'll ever be one, not in it's > current form anyway. > > On 3/11/09, Jacob Schmude <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Wouldn't make sense, seeing as Apple has hinted > the classic won't be > > around much longer. > > > > > > On Mar 11, 2009, at 11:02, Dean Wilcox wrote: > > > >> > >> A talking Iphone? Lets keep it simple for now and > go for the iPod > >> clasic! > >> > >> At 14:32 11/03/2009, you wrote: > >> > >>> hmm, nice cheery outlook you've got there > Will, lol. > >>> > >>> I should imagine the main thrust of this will > be the playlist > >>> selection. 4gb of songs would be quite a > hefty amount to flick > >>> through to try and locate a particular album. > >>> > >>> What struck me as interesting about this > though is that the shuffle > >>> has no screen, so people who're going to > take advantage of > >>> playlisting > >>> are relying solely on VO, just like us. If > nothing else it's nice to > >>> see Apple openly putting some faith into a > spoken interface. If this > >>> is a hit with the consumers, it could go a > long way towards speeding > >>> up talking interfaces for their other > products. > >>> > >>> *cough* iPhone? iPhone Mr Jobs? > >>> > >>> On 3/11/09, william lomas > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> hi apple now have a talking ipod > shuffle. what is the point > >>>> in this? > >>>> if people can't even tell what song > they are listening to that > >>>> crazy lol > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> No virus found in this incoming message. > >>> Checked by AVG. > >>> Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: > 270.11.9/1992 - Release Date: > >>> 3/9/2009 7:20 PM > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > The major difference between a thing that might go > wrong and a > > thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a > thing that cannot > > possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to > be impossible to > > get at or repair. > > --Douglas Adams > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
