So *that's* what I was missing. Ouch.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 1:54 PM Clemens Lang <c...@macports.org> wrote: > Hi again, > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 07:43:43PM +0100, Clemens Lang wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 01:53:20PM -0500, Dave Allured - NOAA Affiliate > via macports-users wrote: > > > I looked at the Audacity website, https://www.audacityteam.org . It > > > looks like Audacity is in robust current maintenance, sources are > > > available, and legacy and modern Mac OS versions are supported through > > > Ventura and Intel/M1/M2. The current release is 3.2.4, almost two > > > years ahead of the version cited by René. You said this is in limbo? > > > What am I missing? > > > > We should probably consider moving to Tenacity, as upstream Audacity has > > recently taken a few decisions that are questionable. > > > > See [1] for more details on this and the current Tenacity source code. > > Ideally, we'd add a new tenacity port and possibly mark audacity as > > replaced_by tenacity, or at least add a note about this. > > > > [1]: > https://codeberg.org/tenacityteam/tenacity/src/branch/main/README.md#user-content-motivation > > Actually re-reading some of the upstream tickets referenced there, the > audacity developers seem to have taken the feedback they received on > these changes seriously, so maybe the situation isn't as bad as I made > it out to be. > > Something to be aware of regardless, but please do check upstream > sources and come to your own conclusions. > > -- > Clemens >
