> On 3 Jun 2020, at 9:10 pm, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jun 3, 2020, at 05:38, Carlo Tambuatco wrote:
>>
>> I’m attempting to build emacs-27 from source and I would like to have AppKit
>> support for running natively on macOS and Gtk3 support.
>>
>> These are the gtk3 libraries I’ve got installed:
>>
>> gtk-osx-application-common-gtk3 @2.0.8_0 (active)
>> gtk-osx-application-gtk3 @2.0.8_0 (active)
>> gtk3 @3.24.20_0+quartz (active)
>> gwenhywfar4-gtk3 @4.20.2_0 (active)
>>
>> This is the warning I got during the configure step of compilation:
>>
>> checking for X... no
>> checking AppKit/AppKit.h usability... no
>> checking AppKit/AppKit.h presence... yes
>> configure: WARNING: AppKit/AppKit.h: present but cannot be compiled
>> configure: WARNING: AppKit/AppKit.h: check for missing prerequisite
>> headers?
>> configure: WARNING: AppKit/AppKit.h: see the Autoconf documentation
>> configure: WARNING: AppKit/AppKit.h: section "Present But Cannot Be
>> Compiled"
>> configure: WARNING: AppKit/AppKit.h: proceeding with the compiler's result
>> configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------ ##
>> configure: WARNING: ## Report this to [email protected] ##
>> configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------ ##
>> checking for AppKit/AppKit.h... no
>> configure: error: The include files (AppKit/AppKit.h etc) that
>> are required for a Nextstep build are missing or cannot be compiled.
>> Either fix this, or re-configure with the option '--without-ns’.
>
> The config.log file is where I would look to understand why this is happening.
>
>
>> And configure says I do not have X installed:
>>
>> checking for X… no
>>
>> I also have ImageMagick installed, so I would like to link to that during
>> the build also.
>
> Any reason why you don't want to use the emacs or emacs-devel ports that are
> already in MacPorts? They do have an +imagemagick variant you can use.
Also note there is the emacs-app port that builds a native gui version. Sounds
like exactly what is being asked for...
Chris
>
>
>> So, I would like to know if there are extra devel libraries I need from
>> macports and if I already have the relevant
>> libraries, how do I link to them when building emacs-27…?
>
> Just to make sure we're on the same page about terminology, if you're
> referring to the -devel packages offered in some Linux package management
> systems, which provide headers and other files needed to build something
> against a library whereas the actual library files would be in a non-devel
> package, MacPorts doesn't do it that way. In MacPorts, the headers, libraries
> and binaries will all be together in a single port.
>
> We do have some -devel ports, as I mentioned emacs-devel above, but they have
> a different purpose in MacPorts: The -devel port will offer a (usually more
> recent) development version of the software while the non-devel port will
> offer a stable version of the software.
>
> AppKit, being a part of macOS, won't be in a port; it'll just be there in the
> OS.
>