Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > I don't know how it is now, but macOS/OS X clients on VirtualBox used to be a > real pain to set up, starting with an ancient version of OS X and then > updating to the desired level, with fingers crossed. Parallels (yearly > subscription fee) is much better, but I know it does enforce the Server > requirement (see next paragraph).
I've done a clean install from scratch of 10.13.x in VirtualBox. The only limitation is, that you'll have to hard-code the screen-size. It's also possible to port this to a WinTel 10 machine. The reason I'm interested in using a VM for 10.3.6 is, that I'm currently making my toolchain universal on a 32 bit Core Duo in order to be able to rsync this to my 64 bit Core 2 Duo because LibcxxOnOlderSystems currently is sevely broken ... and it's taking 🤬ages🤬. Also, the MacPro has 12 CPU cores / 24 threads, and it's blisteringly fast when compiling clang & llvm et al. Alternatively, I could use my Core i7 MacBook Pro if that's a better choice CPU vise ?!? -- Bjarne D Mathiesen Korsør ; Danmark ; Europa ---------------------------------------------------------------------- denne besked er skrevet i et (næsten) M$-frit miljø MacOS X 10.13.6 High Sierra : 17" 2011 MacBook Pro ; 2.8GHz Intel Core i7 ; 16GB 1067MHz DDR3 2012 Mac Pro ; 2 x 3.46GHz 6-Core Xeon ; 48GB MacOS X 10.6.8 Snow Leopard : Mac Mini ; 2GHz Core 2 Duo (64 bit) ; 4GB (3GB actual) 667MHz Mac Mini ; 1.83GHz Core Duo (32 bit) ; 2GB 667Mhz
