Or to put it another way, relax: this particular malformed_macho has nothing to do with what the #MeToo folks complain about. :-)
> On Mar 10, 2019, at 19:11, Richard L. Hamilton <rlha...@smart.net> wrote: > > While someone who can speak authoritatively needs to confirm this, the name > certainly suggests a Mach-O (Mac's object file format) executable that's > purposely malformed as test data for routines that manipulate object files. > As such, it probably _should_ be corrupt, and is probably not cause for > concern. >
