> On Sep 28, 2018, at 6:32 PM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote: > > On Sep 28, 2018, at 13:20, Michael wrote: > >> On 2018-09-28, at 9:50 AM, Thomas Bodlien wrote: >> >>> But why? >>> What do you need 32-Bit Support for? >> >> Wine is probably the best example of a 32 bit only port right now. > > Wine isn't 32-bit only; it's universal. And with a few changes to the > Portfile it can build 64-bit only. But then it can't run any 32-bit Windows > software, which is probably rather limiting. As I mentioned in other threads, > I'm working on a solution involving the use of the 10.13 SDK on 10.14 so that > we can continue to build universal, and Codeweavers is working on a solution > that will work even after macOS drops 32-bit support entirely, probably > through the use of an emulator like qemu. LOL - So much for the “explanation” — Wine Is Not An Emulator :) T.T.F.N. William H. Magill # iMac11,3 Core i7 [2.93GHz - 8 GB 1067MHz] OS X 10.13.6 # Macmini6,1 Intel Core i5 [2.5 Ghz - 4GB 1600MHz] OS X 10.13.6 # MacPro5,1 Quad-Core Intel Xeon [2.8 GHz - 16 GB 1066 MHz] OSX 10.13.6 mag...@icloud.com mag...@mac.com whmag...@gmail.com
Re: User information about macOS Mojave
William H. Magill via macports-users Sat, 29 Sep 2018 13:50:45 -0700
- Re: User inform... Richard L. Hamilton
- Re: User in... Ces VLC
- Re: User in... Dominik Reichardt
- Re: User in... Ces VLC
- Re: User information about macOS... Ken Cunningham
- Re: User information about macOS Moja... Thomas Bodlien
- Re: User information about macOS... Ces VLC
- Re: User information about macOS... Dominik Reichardt
- Re: User information about macOS... Michael
- Re: User information about m... Ryan Schmidt
- Re: User information abo... William H. Magill via macports-users