I appreciate the info; it's a good idea IMO, at any rate better than individually patching ports to add the missing functions, although since they still have to know to use it, some of the problems that a local (rather than upstream) solution involves, may still apply.
> On Apr 30, 2017, at 12:35, Ken Cunningham <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Oh, I guess I misunderstood you. I thought you were asking for a getline > compatibility library for snow leopard, so that's what I steered you towards. > It works, to build nss. You can use it if you like. > > >> On Apr 30, 2017, at 8:16 AM, Richard L. Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> From my POV, I just want it to work, and one way is as good as another. :-) >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
