On Mon, 21 Nov 2016, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > > Why would an inactive replaced port have dependents? > > I'm not sure.
Well, I've come to a grinding halt because of this. What further information can I supply so this can be fixed? Note that I don't even know what that port is (I assume it's to do with Perl), as it's required by something else. -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
