How does this gtk +no_x11 stack against the Imendio GTK+ -- is it the same one? I was building an app one way or another and got two different-looking widget styles, both X-less. One is more angular and another is more mushy. I have the following goodies installed over last year:
-- MacPorts: gtk2 +no_x11+quartz -- /Library/Frameworks/GTK+.framework # this contains 2.14.X11 -- /Library/Frameworks/Gtk.framework # looks like Imendio, has ./Resources/dev/lib/pkgconfig/gtk+-quartz-2.0.pc but no -x11 one My way of selecting one was to export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/local/lib/pkgconfig for MacPorts' one, or the one from a framework which I want to use. Can someone with experience with all of those summarize whether gtk2 +no_x11 obviates the need for any of the frameworks? Alas there's no GtkGlArea and the last time I checked some Gtk folks resisted making their pieces X-less, so not all gtk2 is available without X, quartz-only, but that's a different question -- given I stick with +no_x11, I wonder whether a <some_GTK2>.framework is in any way superior to the port gtk2. Cheers, Alexy _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
