Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> If you have naming consistency which it looks like you do you could do:
>
> port reload bind9:
>
> <pseudo code>
> function reload ($2) {
> launchctl stop "org.macports.$2";
> launchctl start "org.macports.$2";
> }
In fact it is not a reload, but a restart. And I don't see any point in
integrating the launchctl interface into port. port load/unload are
useful as you do not have to type the long path names to the plist
files, but everything else should be done with launchctl.
Rainer
PS: Please remember to use "Reply All" so your message goes also to the
list and not only to me.
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
